3 research outputs found

    Deconstructing Approximate Offsets

    Full text link
    We consider the offset-deconstruction problem: Given a polygonal shape Q with n vertices, can it be expressed, up to a tolerance \eps in Hausdorff distance, as the Minkowski sum of another polygonal shape P with a disk of fixed radius? If it does, we also seek a preferably simple-looking solution P; then, P's offset constitutes an accurate, vertex-reduced, and smoothened approximation of Q. We give an O(n log n)-time exact decision algorithm that handles any polygonal shape, assuming the real-RAM model of computation. A variant of the algorithm, which we have implemented using CGAL, is based on rational arithmetic and answers the same deconstruction problem up to an uncertainty parameter \delta; its running time additionally depends on \delta. If the input shape is found to be approximable, this algorithm also computes an approximate solution for the problem. It also allows us to solve parameter-optimization problems induced by the offset-deconstruction problem. For convex shapes, the complexity of the exact decision algorithm drops to O(n), which is also the time required to compute a solution P with at most one more vertex than a vertex-minimal one.Comment: 18 pages, 11 figures, previous version accepted at SoCG 2011, submitted to DC

    Polygonal reconstruction from approximate offsets

    No full text
    Given a polygonal shape Q with n vertices, can it be expressed, up to a tolerance ε in Hausdorff distance, as the Minkowski sum of another polygonal shape with a disk of fixed radius? If it does, we also seek a preferably simple solution shape P;P’s offset constitutes an accurate, vertex-reduced, and smoothened approximation of Q. We give a decision algorithm for fixed radius in O(nlogn) time that handles any polygonal shape. For convex shapes, the complexity drops to O(n), which is also the time required to compute a solution shape P with at most one more vertex than a vertex-minimal one
    corecore